This research focuses on the crucial issue of categorization processes within the context of the food industry terminology in the English language. The study is based on an analysis of lexicographic data from specialized and explanatory dictionaries, employing methods of systematization and categorical analysis of food industry terms. The study examines how linguistic expressions are used to categorize and represent the concepts and processes associated with the food industry. It also explores the significance of the "process" category within this specialized domain. The research identifies three primary ontological categories of the food industry conceptual domain: objects, processes, and subjects. Among these, the category of "processes" emerges as particularly significant. In the food industry, processes encompass a wide array of activities and phenomena that are vital for the transformation of raw materials into finished food products. These processes are integral to ensuring efficiency, product quality, and safety within the industry. The primary objective of the research is to shed light on the role of the processes category and its linguistic representation in the English food industry terminology. The research also identifies productive linguistic elements, including special vocabulary, specialized morphemes, terms created on the basis of metaphorical transfer and syntactic constructions, that contribute to the formation of terms related to the "process" category
terminology; food industry; categorization; “process” category
[1] Black, C. (2007). Dictionary of food science and nutrition. Nutrition & Food Science, 37(4), 29-292. doi: 10.1108/nfs.2007.37.4.292.1.
[2] Davidson, A. (2014). The Oxford companion to food. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[3] Food Industries, Food Standards Agency (UK). (n.d). Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/food-standards-agency.
[4] Food Safety Glossary. (n.d). Retrieved from https://www.fightbac.org/food-poisoning/food-safety-glossary/.
[5] International Food Information Service. (2005). Dictionary of food science and technology. Oxford: Blackwell.
[6] Kiselyova, O.G. (2012). Language means of the category “cause – effect” in nosological units. Studia Linguistica, 6(1), 107-110.
[7] Lashkul, V.A. (2021). Linguistic means of the process category in English epizootic terminology. International Journal of Philology, 12(4), 51-53.
[8] Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. (2000). Retrieved from https://www.ldoceonline.com/.
[9] Martyniuk, A.P. (2011). Dictionary of basic terms of cognitive and discourse linguistics. Kharkiv: V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University.
[10] Reida, O.A. (2022). The main problems in the translation of terminology in the food industry. In Language and literature in a multicultural space: Materials of the international scientific and practical conference (pp. 35-37). Lviv: Scientific philological organisation “Logos”.
[11] Rozhkov, Y.G. (2021). Object categorisation of English-language nominations of animal diseases. International Journal of Philology, 12(4), 55-59.
[12] Sirotina, O.O. (2021). Means of linguistic representation of the category of space in the English terminology of biotechnology. International Philological Journal, 12(1), 102-107.
[13] Syrotina, O. (2021). Representation of the space category in the English terminology of biotechnologу. Euromentor Journal-Studies about Education, 12(1), 118-132.
[14] Syrotina, O. (2022). Concept categories expressed in English terms of the biotechnology sphere. Cogito -Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 1, 174-187.
[15] The Britannica Dictionary. (n.d). Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/process.
[16] The Free Dictionary by Farlex. (n.d). Retrieved from https://www.thefreedictionary.com/process.
[17] USDA National Agricultural Library's Food and Nutrition Information Center (FNIC) Glossary. (n.d). Retrieved from https://www.nal.usda.gov/.