Pedagogical shift in contemporary foreign language teaching: Based on multi-cultural / lingual data sets

Oksana Chaika
Abstract

The presented research looks at the possibility of implementing some ‘good practices’ in the foreign language teaching (FLT) at the tertiary level of education. Also, it is emphasized that the FLT curricula require a deeper plunge into culture studies, which results in strengthening the multicultural and multilingual component in education. Having studied, implemented, adjusted various sets of methods and techniques for FLT in multinational classroom, which, not so long ago, were recognized most effective, the survey findings and questionnaires make it hard to agree. These days students claim that the educational system appears outdated and they cannot boast of motivation and drive to perform well in class. Among the reasons are issues with discipline, time management, skill sets, unpredictable situations, which challenge stress resilience and emotional regulation. No longer knowledge-based approach in FLT may meet the goals of the learner. In digital era, any sort of information may be found online immediately upon request, and the digital skills of students are often well developed. What will make and/or keep them motivated, how can the students feel passionate about their study and perform well or high in their learning curve? – are just a few questions, which modern FL teachers ask themselves and each other. The paper, via distinguishing the difference between the terms of multiculturalism, multilingualism, plurilingualism, as well as task- and people-oriented approaches of leadership theories, discusses possible solutions and presents templates / models of effective communication and building trust between the teacher and the student in multinational class. Also, a part of the model filled in with students’ possible answers may help shape the vision how the pedagogical shift in education through effective out-of-class communication in foreign language teaching may become a game-changer in the educational paradigms

Keywords

multicultural education; multilingualism; foreign language teaching (FLT); FL teacher; modern education

Suggested citation
Chaika, O. (2023). Pedagogical shift in contemporary foreign language teaching: Based on multi-cultural / lingual data sets . International Journal of Philology, 14(1), 112-121. https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog14(1).2023.012
References

[1] Androsovych, K.A., Rudyk, Y.M., Melnyk, M.Y., Kovalova, O.A., & Yakymova, I.O. (2021). Psychological guidance of the socialisation process of gifted students using information and communications technology means. Journal of Intellectual Disability ‒ Diagnosis and Treatment, 9(3), 236-246. doi: 10.6000/2292-2598.2021.09.02.11.

[2] Bhaduri, R. (2019). Leveraging culture and leadership in crisis management. European Journal of Training and Development, 43(3). doi: 10.1108/EJTD-10-2018-0109.

[3] Chaika, O. (2021a). Adoption of team coaching competencies for innovative translation and foreign language instruction: Polylingual and polycultural dimensions in higher education. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 4(11), 3420-3431. doi: 10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i11-52.

[4] Chaika, O. (2021b). Can leadership-coaching mind-set substitute that of crisis management in higher education?Journal for Researching Education Practice and Theory (JREPT), 4(2), 14-50.

[5] Chaika, O., Savytska, I., Sharmanova, N., & Zakrenytska, L. (2021). Poly- and/or multiculturality of future teachers in foreign language instruction: Methodological facet. WISDOM, 20(4), 126-138. doi: 10.24234/wisdom.v20i4.583.    

[6] Chernysh, V., Dzhochka, I., Marieiev, D., Kuzebna, V., & Shkvorchenko, N. (2021). Formation of communicative professionally oriented competence of future philologists. ALRJournal, 5(1), 185-194. doi: 10.14744/alrj.2020.44711.

[7] Gaffar, V.F. (1995). Guidelines for implementing the prototyped curriculum of core values for enhancing international understanding, cooperation and peace. Bangkok: UNESCO Principal Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific.

[8] Halian, I.M., & Hryntsiv, M.V. (2015). Theoretical analysis of research on self-regulation as a factor in the professional development of an individualScientific Bulletin of Kherson State University. Psychological Sciences, 3, 22-26.  

[9] Irgatoğlu, A. (2021). Analysis of language learning strategies and stereotypical thoughts of preparatory school students. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(1), 1-16. doi: 10.52462/jlls.1.

[10] Kaikkonen, P. (1994). Culture and foreign language teaching - some aspects of the development of the cultural image of foreign language learners and the organisation of foreign language teaching at school. Concepts of Regional Studies, 3.

[11] Leithwood, K.A. (2012). Ontario leadership framework, 2012: With a discussion of the research foundations. Ministry of Education. 

[12] Lewin, K. (1939). Experiments in social spaceHarvard Educational Review, 9, 21-32.

[13] Nickerson, C. (2022). Leadership styles and frameworks you should know. Retrieved from www.simplypsychology.org/leadership-styles.html.

[14] Recommendation CM/Rec (2022)1 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on the importance of plurilingual and intercultural education for democratic culture. (n.d). Retrieved from https://www.ecml.at/Portals/1/documents/about-us/CM_Rec(2022)1E.pdf.

[15] Salama, H., & Bachr, C. (2019). Implement of the informationInternational Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 27(2), 456-462.

[16] Salama, H., Elmannai, W., & Bach, C. (2014). MulticulturalismInternational Journal of Innovation and Scientific Research, 3(2), 199-207.

[17] Shynkaruk, L.V., & Shynkaruk, V.D. (2019). Issues of interethnic relations in the creative heritage of Panteleimon Kulish. International Journal of Philology, 1(10), 28-37. doi: 10.31548/philolog2019.01.028.

[18] Shynkaruk, V., & Kharchenko, S. (2020). Communicative-Functional Potential of Incentive Modality in Psycholinguistic Dimension. Psycholinguistics, 28(2), 183-203. doi: 10.31470/2309-1797-2020-28-2-183-203.

[19] Shynkaruk, V., Salata, H., & Danylova, T. (2018). Myth as a phenomenon of culture. National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald, 4. doi: 10.32461/2226-3209.4.2018.152938.

[20] Sidash, N., Roganova, M., Domina, V., Victorova, L., Roganov, M., & Miroshnichenko, V. (2020). Pedagogical consciousness formation of future university educators in the process of teaching English. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 1202-1211. doi: 10.13189/ujer.2020.080410.

[21] Sinek, S. (2011). Start with why. How great leaders inspire everyone to take action. Westminster: Penguin.

[22] Sopivnyk, R. (2016). The construction of leadership qualities cluster of agroindustrial sector future specialistsPersonal Spirituality: Methodology, Theory and Practice, 3, 293-307.  

[23] Török, V., & Jessner, U. (2017). Multilingual awareness in Ln (foreign language) learners’ strategies and processing. Alkalmazott Nyelvtudomány, 17(2). doi: 10.18460/ANY.2017.2.012.

[24] Tymchenko, I.I. (2001). Forming communicative culture of students in the process of teaching the humanities. Kharkiv.

[25] Zahorulko, S., Kryvych, M., Bloshchynskyi, I., Farmahei, O., Petrenko, S. (2021). Assessing English communicative competence via distant testingALRJournal, 5(1), 84-92. doi: 10.14744/alrj.2020.22043.

[26] Zaretska, I. (2005). Communicative culture as a component of pedagogical culture. School Director Ukraine, 3(5), 149-157.