Strilets, V.
(2023).
Approaches to assessing translation proficiency.
International Journal of Philology,
14(4),
89-98.
https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog14(4).2023.09
Introduction. An important component of the system of specialized translation competence development is the assessment of its proficiency level, which should be based on the latest developments in the field of translator training methodology, the translation service industry requirements, and current national and international academic standards. The purpose of this paper is to analyze approaches to translation competence assessment and to distinguish those relevant to assessing specialized translation proficiency of 4th-year Philology students. The author applies theoretical research methods: analyzing research papers referring to translation assessment and academic standards namely the CEFR and the PETRA-E Framework, collating and generalizing their key ideas and provisions as well as synthesizing them in order to outline the approaches to specialized translation competence assessment. Discussion. The level-based approach should be implemented through defining the initial and target levels of specialized translation proficiency separately for English-Ukrainian and Ukrainian-English language pairs and taking into account the CEFR global scale descriptors concerning translating a written text in writing, modified with regard to text type, translation variation (full, fragmentary, summary, abstract), and ICT skills; as well as the PETRA-E Framework competence-based descriptors, altered in accordance with specialized translation features, in particular, terminology and subject matter knowledge and relevant skills. The process-oriented approach is better manifested during formative assessment, the purpose of which is to receive feedback on the effect of specialized translation knowledge acquisition and skill formation. It is implemented through the check-list method and translation text analysis. The product-oriented approach involves evaluating the target text using holistic, analytic (analytic proper, error count, check-list, and norm-referenced) and combined methods depending on translation variation, type and purpose of assessment. Conclusions. Assessing specialized translation competence of 4th-year students majoring in Philology is a complex multifaceted process that is grounded on the level-based, process-oriented and product-oriented approaches. Their implementation relies on the modified CEFR and PETRA-E Framework proficiency descriptors and depends on translation variation, assessment type and purpose
trainee translators; specialized translation; translation competence; proficiency level
[1] Al-Jarf, R. (2021). Critical analysis of translation tests in 18 specialized translation courses for undergraduate students. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 2(3). Doi: 10.24018/ejedu.2021.2.3.86.
[2] Cheng, S. (2019). Exploring process-oriented translation competence assessment: Rationale, necessity, and potential from a problem-solving perspective. In E. Huertas-Barros, S. Vandepitte, & E. Iglesias-Fernández (Eds.), Quality Assurance and Assessment Practices in Translation and Interpreting (pp. 199-225). IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-5225-3.ch009.
[3] Chernovatyi, L.М. (2013). Methodology of teaching translation as speciality: Textbook for translation majors. Vinnytsia: New Book.
[4] Council of Europe. (2020). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment – companion volume. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/common-european-framework-of-reference-for-languages-learning-teaching/16809ea0d4.
[5] Eyckmans, J., & Anckaert, Ph. (2017). Item-based assessment of translation competence: Chimera of objectivity versus prospect of reliable measurement. Linguistica Antverpiensia, New Series: Themes in Translation Studies, 16, 40-56.
[6] Fabrychna, Ya. (2021). Current researches on the issue of assessment in translation didactics. Foreign Languages, 4, 16-28. doi: 10.32589/1817-8510.2021.4.248289.
[7] Fokin, S.B. (2016). Criteria for evaluation of general text translation in accordance with n-point system. Language and Conceptual World Views, 56(2), 311-320. Retrieved from http://postup.zzz.com.ua/Fokin_Kriter_otsinky_perekladu.pdf.
[8] Hurtado Albir, A., & Pavani, S. (2018). An empirical study on multidimensional summative assessment in translation teaching. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 12(1), 25-47. doi: 10.1080/1750399X.2017.1420131.
[9] Ihnatenko, V., & Borshchovetska, V. (2020). Special aspects of gist and abstract translation quality assessment. Foreign Languages, 3(103), 12-17. doi: 10.32589/1817-8510.2020.3.218988.
[10] Korol, T. (2020). Assessment of prospective philologists’ translation performance: Evaluation methods review. Innovative Pedagogy, 26, 54-57. doi: 10.32843/2663-6085/2020/26.10.
[11] Korol, T. (2023). Reflective approach to prospective philologists’ translation competence assessment. doi: 10.31392/NPU-nc.series5.2023.92.2.08.
[12] Kübler, N., Mestivier, A., & Pecman, M. (2018). Teaching specialised translation through corpus linguistics: Translation quality assessment and methodology evaluation and enhancement by experimental approach. Meta, 63(3), 807-825. doi: 10.7202/1060174a.
[13] Mateo, R.M. (2014). A deeper look into metrics for translation quality assessment (TQA): A case study. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies, 49, 73-94.
[14] Mei, H., & Chen, H. (2022). Assessing students’ translation competence: Integrating China’s standards of English with cognitive diagnostic assessment approaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, article number 872025. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.872025.
[15] Nikolaeva, S., & Korol, T. (2021). Prospective philologists’ translation assessment triangulation: Screen video recording and think aloud protocol combination. Advanced Education, 8(18), 30-41. doi: 10.20535/2410-8286.228550.
[16] PETRA-E Framework of Reference for the Education and Training of Literary Translators. (n.d). Retrieved from https://petra-educationframework.eu/.
[17] Strilets, V.V. (2019). Peculiarities of teaching contracted scientific and technical translation. Pedagogical Process: Theory and Practice. Series: Pedagogy, 3-4(66-67), 84-89.
[18] Vázquez y del Árbol, E. (2014). Specialised translation assessment: Uncommon senses and other stories. Lebende Sprachen, 59(1), 1-18. doi: 10.1515/les-2014-0004.
[19] Williams, M. (2013). A holistic-componential model for assessing translation student performance and competency. Mutatis Mutandis, 6(2), 419-443.