Shynkaruk, V.
(2023).
Revisiting syntax of coherent speech.
International Journal of Philology,
14(2),
6-12.
https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog14(2).2023.01
This scientific article deals with the issue of syntax of coherent speech; the relationship between the sentence and the utterance is defined; it is substantiated that the transformation of a sentence (abstract speech unit, sentence scheme) into an utterance (speech unit) of great importance acquires meaningful segmentation essential for a certain situation, corresponding communicative task. To analyse the structural, semantic and pragmatic manifestations of the real language process, the functioning of syntactic units in terms of communicative nomination, the text introduces the concept of discursive utterance, taking into account a set of extralinguistic, pragmatic, psychological factors. It is proved that the concept of a textual communicative unit is most closely related to the theory of discourse - a discursive utterance - a textual combination of parcelled or segmented parts of a sentence or independent predicative units united thematically, which are related to a complete syntactic unit - a grammatical simple or complex sentence
syntax; syntax of coherent speech; text; discourse; sentence; utterance; discursive utterance
[1] Ahmad, J. (2012). Stylistic features of scientific English: A study of scientific research articles. English Language and Literature Studies, 2(1), 47-55. doi: 10.5539/ells.v2n1p47.
[2] Batsevich, F.S. (2002). Terminology of communicative linguistics: Aspects of the discourse approach. Bulletin of Lviv Polytechnic National University, 453, 30-34.
[3] Bilodid, I.K. (1972). Modern Ukrainian literary language: Syntax. Kyiv: Scientific Thought.
[4] Bilodid, I.K. (1979). Superphrase unities as an element of the text in functional styles of the literary language. Linguistics, 2, 14-23.
[5] Bulakhovsky, L.A. (1951). Course of the modern Ukrainian literary language: Syntax. Kyiv: Soviet School.
[6] Dudyk, P.S. (1955). Selective sentences in the modern Ukrainian literary language. Ukrainian Language in School, 6, 10-15.
[7] Ganych, D.I., & Oliynyk, I.S. (1985). Dictionary of linguistic terms. Kyiv: Higher School.
[8] Gobin, Z. (1984). Types of text. A methodological comparison illustrated by a model. Brussel.
[9] Gromyak, R.T., & Kovalev, Yu.A. (1997). Discourse. In Literary dictionary-reference (pp. 201-202). Kyiv: Akademia.
[10] Guivaniuk, N.V. (1993). Formal-semantic relations in the system of syntactic units. (PhD thesis, A.A. Potebnyi Institute of Linguistics, Kyiv, Ukraine).
[11] Harris, Z. (1952). Discours analysis. In Papers in structural and transformational linguistics. Formal linguistics series (pp. 349-372). Springer, Dordrecht. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-6059-1_20.
[12] Kostruba, P.P. (1960). To the question of the concept and classification of incomplete sentences. In Issues of Ukrainian linguistics (pp. 29-32). Lviv.
[13] Marich, S.M. (1988). Structural and semantic features of parceled constructions. Ukrainian Linguistics: Republican Interdepartmental Collection, 15.
[14] Petlychnyi, I.Z. (1961). Joining and separating clauses in the Ukrainian literary language. In Jubilee scientific session devoted to the 300th anniversary of Lviv National University (pp. 39-40). Lviv.
[15] Pivovarov, O.E. (1958). Grammatical means of organisation of superphrase unities in the prose of M. Kotsiubynskyi. Scientific Notes of Taras Shevchenko Kyiv State Institute, 17(2).
[16] Pivovarov, O.E. (1958). Stylistic means of organisation of superphrase unities in Kotsiubynskyi's fiction. Studies in the Ukrainian language. Kyiv.
[17] Shepitko, S. (2010). Components of scientific discourse. Scientific Notes, Series: Philological Sciences (Linguistics), 89(5), 164-167. Kropyvnytskyi: V. Vynnychenko KDPU.
[18] Shinkaruk, V.D. (1997). Essay on the syntax of connected speech (theoretical special course for universities). Chernivtsi: Native Language.
[19] Shyianiuk, L.M. (2010). Text as a basis for the formation of rhetorical culture of students of philology. Bulletin of Lviv University, 50, 371-377. doi: 10.30970/vpl.2010.50.
[20] Silman, T.I. (1967). Problems of syntactic stylistics on the material of German prose.
[21] Van Dijk, T.A. (1976). Text and contex: Exploration in the semantics and progmatics of discourse. Harlow: Longman.
[22] Volkova, S.S. (1980). On the syntactic essence of the concepts of “text unit” and “textual relation”. Structural and Mathematical Linguistics, 8.
[23] Vykhovanets, I.R. (1992). Essays on the functional syntax of the Ukrainian language. Kyiv: Scientific thought.
[24] Vykhovanets, I.R. (1993). Grammar of the Ukrainian language: Syntax. Kyiv: Lybid.