The paper focuses on the complex issues of the short story ‘Syluety’ (1923) by Mykola Khvylovy (1893-1933): the study of the motif of hands, the examination of how the traumatized characters experience spatiality (the space of a room), the dialectic of the body suffering from the consequences of the 1917 revolution, the indirect influence of filmic practice (inter-frame editing, the camera position of the narrator) on the artistic manifestation of the writer’s individual style. The religious, namely Christian, aspects previously described by Yurii Bezkhutryi were further elaborated. Special attention has been given to the characters of Dema and Veronika, who correlate with the author in terms of both biographical and artistic aspects, as well as some psychoanalytic features. The exceptionally complex deep-seated feelings of the characters touch upon the intersection of the fictional “reality” of the work of art and the reader’s present reality, as this piece of narrative is a vivid example of the analysis of relations between people in terms of their dissatisfaction with day-to-day reality and their desire for the ideal. Much like a cinema screen on which a film runs, presenting to the viewer what is to be seen and how it is visually perceived, Mykola Khvylovy conventionally does this in his fiction. The short story under study is a drama of the commonness of social reality, where the characters have already crossed the threshold of their private illusion (desire for change, desire to be needed, desire to love) to face disappointment (phobia) and then proceed to a next level of illusion. The study employs a system of biographical, systemic, hermeneutical, cultural, historical and poetic methods, justified by the specific nature of the survey, its object and subject. The findings are to prove useful to all those involved in the study of the Ukrainian writer’s signature world-view; the analysis of the Ukrainian literature of the first half of the twentieth century development; for experts in artistic anthropology and cultural art
body; consciousness; social; character; art; purpose; ideology; montage; frame; scene
[1] Ageeva, V. (2011). Elegy for unfounded romantics. In Apology of modernity: An outline of the twentieth century (pp. 228-316). Kyiv: Grani-T.
[2] Ageeva, V.P., & Dzeverin, I.O. (1995). Mykola Khvylovyi. Novels, short story “The Story of the Sanatorium Zone”, “Woodcocks”. A novel. Poetic works. Pamphlets. Kyiv: Scientific Thought.
[3] Bekhutryi, Y.M. (2003). Mykola Khvylovyi: Problems of interpretation. Kharkiv: Folio.
[4] Bordwell, D., Thompson, K, & Smith, J. (2016). Film art: An introduction. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
[5] Bourdieu, P. (2014). Men and machines. In Advances in social theory and methodology (pp. 304-317). London: Routledge.
[6] Fahle, O. (2017). Montage. In Handbuch Filmanalyse. Springer Reference Geisteswissenschaften (pp. 1-16). Wiesbaden: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-658-13352-8_4-1.
[7] Grabowicz, G.G. (1998). Symbolic autobiography in the prose of Mykola Khvylovyi (some preliminary observations). Harvard Ukrainian Studies. Cultures and Nations of Central and Eastern Europe, 22, 165-180.
[8] Hayward, S. (2017). Cinema studies: The Key Concepts. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315619729.
[9] Horbolis, L.M. (2021). Inter-artistic contacts of the Ukrainian text. Sumy: Publishing house of Sumy State Pedagogical University named after A.S. Makarenko.
[10] Hühn, P., Meister, Chr.J., Pier, J., & Schmid, W. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of narratology. Boston: De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110316469.
[11] Ilnytzkyj, O.S. (1991). The modernist ideology and Mykola Khvylovyi. Harvard Ukrainian Studies, 3/4(15), 257-262.
[12] Ingarden, R.W. (1946). On the construction of the image. A sketch from the theory of art. Krakow: Printing House of the Jagiellonian University.
[13] Khvylovyi, M. (1992). Letters to Mykola Zerov. Kyiv: Dnipro.
[14] Khvylovyi, M. (2011). Silhouettes. In Mykola Khvylovyi: Selected works (pp. 130-143). Kyiv: Smoloskyp.
[15] Klee, P. (1968). Creative credo. In Theories of modern art: A source book by artists and critics (pp. 182-186). Berkeley: University of California Press.
[16] Kodak, M. (2008). Mykola Khvylovy as an artist-psychologist. Lutsk: Tverdynia.
[17] Kondratenko, N.V. (2012). Syntax of Ukrainian modernist and postmodernist artistic discourse. Kyiv: Dmytro Burago Publishing House.
[18] Kostiuk, G. (1986). Towards a new interpretation of Mykola Khvylovy's biography. In Mykola Khvylovyi: Works in five volumes (pp. 15-38). New York - Baltimore - Toronto: Association of Ukrainian Writers “Slovo” and Ukrainian Publishing House “Smoloskyp” named after V. Symonenko.
[19] Lenska, S.V. (2015). Ukrainian small prose of the 1920s - 1960s: Ideological and thematic dominants, genre models and stylistic strategies. (Doctoral dissertation, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine).
[20] Lepokhin, Ye. (2022). “The song remains the same”: Mykola Khvylovyi’s “non-canonical” short stories and “canonical” writer’s style”. Literary Process: Methodology, Names, Trend, 19, 62-70. doi: 10.28925/2412-2475.2022.19.8.
[21] Lepykhin, E. (2016). Cultural and historical context and individual consciousness: Destructive forms of reception of the world in Mykola Khvylovyi's short story “Barracks outside the city”. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod University. Series: Philology, 2, 166-170.
[22] Levytska, O., & Mocherniuk, N. (2023). War discourse in the biographical novels about artists: Intermedial aspect. Respectus Philologicus, 43(48), 98-109. doi: 10.15388/RESPECTUS.2023.43.48.112.
[23] Lewis, J. (2014). Essential cinema: An introduction to film analysis. Boston: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
[24] Mailer, N. (2013). What I think of artistic freedom. In Mind of an outlaw: Selected essays (pp. 21-24). New York: Random House.
[25] Mostepan, O. (2013). The works of Mykola Khvylovyi in the context of the metaphor of illness (Psychological diseases in the writer's prose). Miracle Word, 11, 56-61.
[26] Muslienko, O. (2015). Mykola Khvylovyi (“Silhouettes”, “Sentimental History”): Transformation of the Künstlerroman model as a strategy of inversion of artistic meaning. Literary Process: Methodology, Names, Trends, 6, 135-139.
[27] Nesteleev, M.A. (2013). On the brink: Suicidal discourse of Ukrainian modernism. Kyiv: Akademvydav.
[28] Rajewsky, I.O. (2002). Intermediality. Tübingen: Basel.
[29] Ricoeur, P. (1992). Oneself as another. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
[30] Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
[31] Schwanecke, Chr. (2015). Filmic modes in literature. In Handbook of intermediality: Literature – Image – Sound – Music (pp. 268-286). doi: 10.1515/9783110311075-016.
[32] Tarnawsky, M. (1992). European influence in Ukrainian modernist prose. Canadian Slavonic Papers, 34(1-2), 131-142. doi: 10.1080/00085006. 1992.11091981.
[33] Zizek, S. (1991). For they know not what they do: Enjoyment as a political factor. London: Verso.
[34] Zizek, S. (2010). Living in the end times. London: Verso.