The article analyzes one of the speech strategies - the strategy of self-presentation, which is actively used in modern Ukrainian political discourse. It has been established that the question of the role of political discourse, in particular the influence of the linguistic personality of a Ukrainian politician on the formation of the country's internal and external political image, is becoming particularly relevant today, given the conditions of the multinational and multilingual situation that has developed in Ukraine, on the one hand, and the full-scale invasion of the russian federation to our land, on the other hand. In such conditions, the mechanisms of self-representation, the tactics of implementing the linguistic influence of government representatives on the citizens of the state are changing, which needs to be studied. The scientific investigation clarified the role of self-presentation in the formation of the linguistic personality of the Ukrainian politician, analyzed the main mechanisms of this communicative strategy and the pragmalinguistic specifics of its implementation in today's conditions. Emphasis is placed on the interdependence, mutual subordination of the content of the communicative strategy of self-presentation of a linguistic personality and a wide range of communication methods and communicative intentions of self-presenters. It was established that the tactics of identification, self-praise, demonstration of professional success and promises serve as means of actualizing the strategy of self-presentation, the application of which is outlined by certain linguistic means. The specificity of the mentioned tactics is clarified and a description of lexical and grammatical means is presented, which are important in the formation of the strategy of self-presentation of the linguistic personality, since they significantly emphasize not only the communicative and situational features of the speech of individual politicians, but also the authorial discourses of political figures within the limits of various tactics. We see the perspective of the research in studying the mechanisms of implementation of other communicative strategies in the linguistic activity of famous Ukrainian politicians, delineating the pragmalinguistic specificity of their statements, taking into account the intentions of the addressee and the peculiarities of the perception of information by the addressee
act of self-expression; self-presentation tactics; communicative intention; linguistic personality; pragmalinguistic specificity; political discourse
[1] Charteris-Black, J. (2014). Analysing political speeches: Rhetoric, discourse and metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
[2] Derenchuk, N.V. (2018). The linguistic portrait of a modern Ukrainian politician. (Dissertation for the degree of PhD in Philological Sciences). Lutsk.
[3] Kirichok, I. (2017). Self-presentation of future heads of general educational institutions as a psychological and pedagogical problem. Young Scientist, 5, 369-374.
[4] Kuzmich, N. (2013). Communicative strategy of self-presentation and tactics of its implementation (based on the materials of television interviews). Bulletin of Lviv University. Foreign Languages Series, 21, 89-94.
[5] Lazarenko, N.I, Kolomiets, A.M, Palamarchuk, O.M. (2018). Communication in the Internet space: psychological aspect. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 65(3), 249-261.
[6] Oktar, L. (2001). The ideological organization of representational processes in the presentation of them and us. Discourse & Society, 12(3), 313-346. doi: 10.1177/0957926501012003003.
[7] Papish, V. (2014). Self-presentation of a demonstrative linguistic personality in Lesia Ukrainka's dramatic poem “Obsessed”. Scientific Notes of the National University of Ostroh Academy. Series: Philological, 48, 99-102.
[8] Pavlushenko, O., Mazai, L., Kolia-dych, Y., Pavlykivska, N., Prokopchuk, L., & Poliarush, N. (2021). The concept of the Family in the thinking of the young generation of Ukrainians. AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 11(1), 125-128.
[9] Schlenker, В. (2003). Self-presentation. In Hand-book of self and identity (pp. 492-518). New York: Guilford.
[10] Serdiychuk, L. (2004). Autobiography as a way of self-presentation of a linguistic personality. Bulletin of Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University, 16, 120-122.
[11] Stryi, L. (2015). Ritual genres of Ukrainian political discourse: Structural-semantic and linguistic-pragmatic aspects. (PhD thesis, Odesa I.I. Mechnikov National University, Odesa, Ukraine).
[12] Tedeschi, J. (1981). Identities, the phenomenal self, and laboratory research. In Impression management theory and social psychological research (pp. 3-22). New York: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-685180-9.50006-3.
[13] Wodak, R. (2007). Pragmatics and critical discourse analysis. A cross-disciplinary inquiry. Pragmatics & Cognition, 15(1), 203-225. doi: 10.1075/pc.15.1.13wod.
[14] Yashenkova, O.V. (2010). Fundamentals of the theory of language communication. Kyiv: Akademia Publishing Centre.
[15] Zavalniuk, I., Kholod, I., Bohatko, V., Pavlyuk, O. (2022). Lexical-syntactical repetition in the system of stylistic figures: Status, specification, functions. Ad Alta: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 12(1), 268-274.