International Journal of Philology

The students’ linguistic work with english three components terminological cartographical statements

Kateryna Yakushko, Angelina Polishchuk, Liudmyla Berezova
Download article
Abstract

Introduction. Nowadays it is a lack of detailed surveys to observe linguistic students’ several stages work aiming to develop multiprofessional soft skills. Methods. We applied pedagogical experiment while future cartographers’ linguistic work. Results. There are such categories of three components constant terminological clichés with the translated Ukrainian morpheme ‘‘карт’’ (hereinafter – TCCMK) according to their structural features as clichés with available additional prepositions and conjunctions or clichés without additional prepositions and conjunctions among which it’s sufficient frequency of only TCCMK structures with one time use of the preposition ‘’of’’ and rare TCCMK with one time use of the conjunction and- or TCCMK with simultaneous one time use and the conjunction and as well as the with preposition “for” or a higher frequency of TCCMK use without additional prepositions and conjunctions within the reference terminology. Also it is TCCMK identifcation noting the available parts of speech in eight varieties with a priority of the use of TCCMK in adjective-adjective-noun relations and adjective-adjective-noun relations and it is the rare use of forms of participle-adjective-noun relations and noun-adjective-noun relations as well as pronoun-noun relations involving proper names within TCCMK which do not differ in high frequency, although they are unexpectedly available in comparison with other branches of terminology. TCCMK linguisti observation results might be used on practice while three types dialogues composition. Discussion. Prospects is describing the experience to select terminological structures for the practical purpose of developing students’ soft skills

Keywords

stable clichés; three elements structure; cartographic vocabulary; foreign language version

Suggested citation
Yakushko, K., Polishchuk, A., & Berezova, L. (2022). The students’ linguistic work with english three components terminological cartographical statements . International Journal of Philology, 13(4), 112-121.
References

[1] Berezova, L.V., Mudra, S.V., Yakushko, K.H. (2018). The effect of webquests on the writing and reading performance of university students. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 64(2), 110-118. doi: 10.33407/itlt.v64i2.1979.

[2] Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. Cartographic dictionary. (n.d). Retrieved from https://www.ibge.gov.br/en/geosciences/methods-and-reference-documents/terminology-and-glossaries/18546-cartographic-dictionary.html?=&t=sobre.

[3] Chaika, O.I (2021). Educating multiculturalism in higher education through reflection. International Philological Journal, 12(4), 145-148. doi: 10.31548/philology2021.04.026.  

[4] Drozdova, I.P. (2012). The system of exercises for the development of professional speech of students of higher educational institutions of non-philological profile. Scientific notes. Series “Pedagogy”, 1, 74-79.

[5] Kusil, V., & Grabovska, I. (2019). Theoretical foundations of the study of metacommunicative markers in modern linguistics. In Materials of the international scientific-practical conference “Trends and prospects for the development of science and education in the context of globalisation” (pp. 344-346). Pereiaslav.

[6] Litinsky, V.V. (2001). Geodetic encyclopaedic dictionary. Lviv: Evrosvit.

[7] Perry-Castañeda Library Map Collection. Glossary of Cartographic Terms. (n.d). Retrieved from https://maps.lib.utexas.edu/maps/glossary.html.

[8] Polishchuk, A.V. (2016). Formation of foreign language communicative competence of students of non-philological specialities in the light of European standards of education quality. In Pedagogy in the system of humanitarian knowledge (pp. 115-116). Kherson: Helvetica Publishing House.

[9] Sidoruk, G.I. (2021). Analysis of structural and semantic characteristics of agricultural terms in the translation aspect. International Philological Journal, 12(4), 40-44. doi: 10.31548/philolog2021.04.007.

[10] Syrotina, O.O (2022). Morphological concept BIO- in the processes of conceptual derivation of English biotechnological units. International Philological Journal, 13(1), 34-40.

[11] Usyk, L.M., Pryimak, L.V., Siliutina, I.O. (2022). The role of English linguistic terminology in modern scientific discourse. International Philological Journal, 13(1), 14-23. doi: 10.31548/philolog2022.01.014.

[12] Vaskivska, H., Palamar, S., & Poryadchenko, L. (2019). Psycholinguistic aspects of forming a culture of dialogue communication. Psycholinguistics, 26(2), 11-26. doi: 10.31470/2309-1797-2019-26-2-11-26.

[13] Yakushko, K.G. (2022). Development of professional mobility of future cartographers through foreign language linguistic studies. In Modern education: Strategies and technologies of learning (pp. 443-447). Pereyaslav: Dombrovska.

[14] Yaremenko, N.V. (2021). Implementation of elements of subject-integrated learning for the development of students' oral communication. International Philological Journal, 12(4), 145-149  doi: 10.31548/philolog2021.03.145.

[15] Yatsenko, T., Ivashkevich, E., Galushko, L., & Kulakova, L. (2022). Dialogue in the deep cognition of the subject's psyche: The functioning of pragmatic reference statements. Psycholinguistics, 31(1), 187-232.