Vakulyk, I.
(2022).
The concept of “information space” of the present: Sources, state, prospects .
International Journal of Philology,
13(4),
75-84.
https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog13(4_1).2022.008
Information has always been valued, now it has become even more valuable. Today it is considered the most important resource for the development of society. Recently, issues related to information warfare have been actively discussed not only in our country but also abroad. Despite thirty years of independence of our country, the concept of information space has not lost its relevance. Therefore, our task was to demonstrate with the help of which frames (in their broad interpretation from the point of view of linguistics, psychology, communication in general and knowledge as a picture of the world, the source of which is time, circumstances and actions) information is framed. The purpose of the study is to present the concept of "information space" in the projection to the present. The multidimensionality of the coverage of this issue in scientific discourse is explained by various factual materials. Therefore, the paper uses traditional methods of scientific research - analysis and synthesis - to identify the most important features of the phenomenon under study. Discussion. Linguistic units have different thematic and genre load, and therefore compositional build their own caches in the communicative space. There are codes - rubrics - symbols that help to decipher any information. We tried to highlight the concept of information space, based on our own observations and developments, which may not coincide with the generally accepted ones. Its main advantages are a high level of mobility. Conclusions. The article analyzes how information security occurs and what influences it. The author's own interpretation of "information space" in the context of modern communication is presented. This is encoded information that you need to be able to decipher. And everyone chooses the tools and platforms himself. This research can be used in teaching the theory of disciplines related to algorithmization, programming, artificial intelligence, linguistic experiments, mathematical linguistics and logic. Information space is a generalized concept of the acquired linguistic experience of mankind based on the objects of the physical world. Information can either be copied or acquire a new sound. Information only becomes valid when it is guaranteed by its use
world picture; concept; information space; language; communication; meanings; text; intention; code
[1] Akulshyn, O.V. (2013). Internet communication in the activities of security sector institutions: Theoretical and applied aspect. Kyiv, Luhansk: Yantar.
[2] Balalaeva, O.Yu. (2013). Faceted classifications of electronic means of educational use. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 38(6), 41-52.
[3] Batsevich, F.S (2010). Essays on linguistic pragmatics. Lviv: PAIS.
[4] Blikhar, V.S., Kozlovets, M.A., Gorokhova, L.V., Fedorenko, V.V., & Fedorenko, V.O. (2020). Philosophy: A dictionary of terms and personalities. Kyiv: KVIC.
[5] Business, innovation, management: Problems and prospects. (2021). In Collection of the II International Scientific and Practical Conference. Kyiv: Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute.
[6] Crick, F., & Koch, C. (1990). Towards a neurobiological theory of consciousness. Seminars in the Neurosciences, 2, 263-75.
[7] Crick, F., & Koch, C. (1991). Some reflections on visual awareness. Symposium on Quantitative Biology, 55, 953-962. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1990.055.01.089.
[8] Dagenbach, D., Carr, Th., & Wilhelm-sen, A. (1989). Task-induced strategies and near-threshold priming: Conscious effects on unconscious perception. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 412-443.
[9] Dennett, D.C. (1988). Quining qualia. In Consciousness in modern science (pp. 42-47). New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.
[10] Dictionary of the Ukrainian language. Manipulation. (n.d). Retrieved from http://sum.in.ua/s/manipuljacija.
[11] Dulany, D.E. (1985). On consciousness in syntactic learning and judgment: A reply to Reber, Allen and Regan. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 114(1), 25-32. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.114.1.25.
[12] Encyclopaedia of literary studies. (2007). Manipulation. Retrieved from http://slovopedia.org.ua/42/53404/285589.html.
[13] Ericsson, K.A., & Simon, H. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge: MIT Press.
[14] Ferer, E., & Biederman, I.A. 1962). Comparison of reaction time and verbal report in the detection of masked stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(2), 126-30.
[15] Foss, D.J., & Hakes, D.T. (1978). Psycholinguistics: An introduction to the psychology of language. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
[16] Kimmeyer, L., Wortman, K., Kitayama, S., Lemelson, R., & Cummings K. (2020). Culture, mind and brain: new concepts, models and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781108695374.
[17] Law of Ukraine No. 2657-XII “On Information”. (1992, жовтень). Retrieved from http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2657–12.
[18] Lorini, G., & Moroni, S. (2020). How to make norms with drawings: An investigation of normativity beyond the realm of words. Semiotica, 233, 55-76. doi: 10.1515/sem-2018-0062.
[19] May, K. (2004). The information society. A sceptical view. Kyiv: K.I.S.
[20] Nycz, J. (2019). Media and second dialect acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, 152-160. doi: 10.1017/S0267190519000060.
[21] Pocheptsov, G.G. (2006). Theory of communication. Kyiv: Vakler.
[22] Pocheptsov, O.G. (1986). Fundamentals of pragmatic description of a sentence. Kiev: Higher School.
[23] Rajagopalan, K. (2000). On Searle [on Austin] on language. Language & Communication, 20(4), 347-391. doi: 10.1016/S0271-5309(00)00007-0.
[24] Searle, J.R, & Vanderveken, D. (1985). Speech acts and illocutionary logic. In Logic, Thought and Action (pp. 109-132). Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/1-4020-3167-X_5.
[25] Selivanova, O.O. (2008). Modern linguistics: Directions and problems. Poltava: Dovkrivka-K.
[26] Shpeer, A. (n.d.). Biography. Retrieved from http://www.people.su/ua/126010_2.
[27] Slyusarevsky, M.M. (1999). Information space: Criticism of existing definitions and an attempt to build a theory. Herald of Kharkiv State University: Personality and Transformational Processes in Society. Psychological and Pedagogical Problems of Modern Education, 439(4-5), 337-342.
[28] Smagorinsky, P. (2001). Rethinking protocol analysis from a cultural perspective. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 233-245. doi: 10.1017/S0267190501000149.
[29] Snitko, O.S (1992). Cultural analysis of images-indicators of evaluative meanings. Language and Culture, 61-62.
[30] Teun, A., & Van Dijk. (2009). Society and discourse how social contexts influence text and talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[31] Vakulyk, I.I. (2015). Linguistic aspects of scientific communication in synchrony and diachronic. Kyiv: Print Service.
[32] Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine. (n.d). Retrieved from http://surl.li/dhayp.
[33] Zeman, D. (2021). Value in Language. Organon F, 28(3), 498-504. 1335-0668. doi: 10.31577/orgf.2021.28301.