Introduction. The article is devoted to environmental communication, which has been functioning in the global space-time for a long time. The purpose of the survey is to analyze the scope of the concept of "environmental communication", to find out the functions of environmental communication, its subjects, features, types, to analyze the existing models of environmental communication, to identify the largest virtual platforms for environmental communication. Methods. A number of general scientific and linguistic methods were used in the research. In particular, the methods of analysis, synthesis, deduction, induction and the descriptive method are used to justify the theoretical base of the research and generalize the observations. The terminological analysis is applied to the definitions of the concept of "environmental communication" that function in the scientific discourse and the Internet space. The comparative method was used to compare models of environmental communication. Using the method of communicative-pragmatic analysis, the functions of environmental communication were determined. Results and discussion. It was determined that the phenomenon of environmental communication has different scientific treatment in different language traditions. The functioning of the concept of "environmental communication" in the English and Ukrainian scientific paradigms and media space is compared: in the English discourse, the same or similar treatment of this concept is observed, on the other hand, in the Ukrainian scientific discourse, it is used in three different meanings, which, however, have a common seme. A refined definition of the considered concept is proposed. The forms of environmental communication (public, group, interpersonal) and its types (direct and mediated, formal and informal, spontaneous and planned, oral, written and visual, verbal and non-verbal, personal and interpersonal) and its subjects are described, its dual subjectivity and interdisciplinary nature, convergence, cyclicity are emphasized. The functions of environmental communication are distinguished, in particular communicative, epistemological, constitutional-perceptive, interactive, and pragmatic. Models of the structure – linear and convergent – of environmental communication as a subspecies of general communication are considered. Educational and scientific platforms for the exchange of environmentally oriented information were considered. We see the prospects for further research in the following: establish hierarchical relationships between the concepts of "environmental communication" and "environmental discourse"; to reveal the ratio of texts of functional styles in environmental discourse, the structure of Ukrainian environmental discourse, etc
environmental communication; environmental information; environmental issues; eco-communicator
[1] Asteria, D., Suyanti, E., Utari, D., & Wisnu, D. (2014). Model of environmental communication with gender perspective in resolving environmental conflict in urban area study on the role of women's activist in sustainable environmental conflict management. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 20, 553-562. doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2014.03.068.
[2] Brulle, R.J. (2010). From environmental campaigns to advancing the public dialog: Environmental communication for civic engagement. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 82-98. doi: 10.1080/17524030903522397.
[3] Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (Aarhus Convention). (2005, May). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_015#Text.
[4] Cox, R.J., & Phaedra, C.P. (2021). Environmental communication and the public sphere. Washington: SAGE Publications.
[5] Decree of the President of Ukraine No. 722/2019 “On the Sustainable Development Goals of Ukraine for the period up to 2030”. (2019, September). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/722/2019#Text.
[6] Environmental issues in the public information space of Ukraine. (2021). Retrieved from https://www.irf.ua/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/dovkillyeva-problematyka2021_dodanoposylannya.pdf.
[7] Fienitz, M., Busse, M., Fienitz, M., Heiland, S. (2022). Analysing the impact of communication and public participation on the acceptability of Germany’s black forest national park. Journal for Nature Conservation, 67(1), article number 126155. doi: 10.1016/j.jnc.2022.126155.
[8] Flor, A.G. (2003). Environmental communication. Principles, approaches and strategies of communication applied to environmental management. Quezon City: University of the Philippines Diliman.
[9] Gore inscribed his name in the history of mankind as a Nobel laureate. (2007). Retrieved from https://ukrainian.voanews.com/a/a-49-2007-10-12-voa7-86908992/222801.html.
[10] Guzenko, T.A. (2012). Strengthening the role of social networks in environmental communication. Scientific Notes, 3, 15-23.
[11] Harris, U.S. (2017). Engaging communities in environmental communication. Pacific Journalism Review: Te Koakoa, 23(1), 65-79. doi: 10.24135/pjr.v23i1.211.
[12] Janét, K., Richards, O., & Landrum, R.A. (2022). Headline format influences evaluation of, but not engagement with, environmental news. Journalism Practice, 16(1), 35-55. doi: 10.1080/17512786.2020.1805794.
[13] Karyotakis, M-A., & Antonopoulos, N. (2021). Web communication: A content analysis of green hosting companies. Sustainability, 13(2), article number 495. doi: 10.3390/su13020495.
[14] Kharchenko, S., Navalnaya, M., Kostritsa, N., Balalaeva, O., & Fomina, G. (2021). Information support for lifelong learning in the context of sustainable development. Kyiv: Millennium.
[15] Klochko, S.O. (2017). Progress of ecolinguistics in Ukraine: an analytical review. System and Structure of East Slavic Languages, 3-18.
[16] Kononenko, I. (2022). Strategic communication in the environmental sphere. Scientific Works of the Interregional Academy of Personnel Management. Political Science and Public Administration, 1(61), 25-30. doi: 10.32689/2523-4625-2022-1(61)-4.
[17] Lee, D.N., Hutchens, M.J., & Krieger, J.L. (2022). Resolving the do/do not debate: Communication perspective to enhance sustainable lifestyles. Sustainability, 14(2), article number 796. doi: 10.3390/su14020796.
[18] Littlejohn, S.W., & Foss, K.A. (2003). Encyclopedia of communication theory. New Mexico: Sage Reference Publishing.
[19] Loury, E.K, Eschenroeder, J.C, Seat, L., Chea, S., Chhut, C., Kritsanavarin, S., Lovgren, S., Ramsay, E.G, Thao, D., Hogan, Z.S. (2021). Communicating for aquatic conservation in cambodia and beyond: Lessons learned from in-person and media-based environmental education and outreach strategies. Water, 13(13), article number 1853. doi: 10.3390/w13131853.
[20] Meisner, M. (2015). Environmental communication: What it is and why it matters. Retrieved from https://meisner.ca/2015/11/30/environmental-communication-what-it-is-and-why-it-matters/.
[21] Milstein, T., Pileggi, M., & Morgan, E. (2017). Environmental communication pedagogy and practice. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/978131556214.
[22] Mulki, S., & Ormsby, A.A. (2022). Breaking green ceilings: Podcasting for environmental and social change. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 12, 18-27. doi: 10.1007/s13412-021-00723-z.
[23] Sandmen, P. (1972). Who should police environmental advertising?. Columbia Journalism Review, 41-47.
[24] Selivanova, O. (2006). Modern linguistics: A terminological encyclopedia. Poltava: Dovkolyia-K.
[25] Serajim, K. (2010). Discourse as a sociolinguistic phenomenon: Methodology, architectonics, variability. Kyiv: Palyvoda A.V. Publisher.
[26] Shinkaruk, V.I. (2002). Philosophical encyclopaedic dictionary. Kyiv: Abris.
[27] Sukhenko, I. (2016). Environmental communication: Experience of rethinking. Communications and Communicative Technologies, 24(12), 146-148.
[28] Yasir, Y. (2019). Environmental communication planning in the development of mangrove ecotourism in Bengkalis-Indonesia. In Proceedings of the International Conference of CELSciTech 2019 — Social Sciences and Humanities track (ICCELST-SS 2019) (pp. 11-16).