Methodology for analysing cognitive-syntactic phenomena in poetic texts

Olena Pokhyliuk
Abstract

The relevance of this research stems from contemporary linguistics’ growing interest in how linguistic forms and structures, particularly syntax, shape meaning in poetic texts beyond their purely grammatical function. The study’s objective was to develop a methodology for analysing cognitive-syntactic phenomena in poetic texts, enabling the identification of how syntax interacts with perception, memory, and emotional resonance. The research employed methods from cognitive linguistics, componential analysis, cognitive semantics, and construction grammar, which allowed for viewing syntactic structures as encodings of subjective positions, cultural frameworks, and emotional intensities. The analysis was conducted using Carol Ann Duffy’s poetry collection “The World’s Wife” as an example. The obtained results convincingly demonstrate that poetic syntax extends far beyond simple stylistic embellishment. It functions as a powerful cognitive tool that actively shapes and reflects the thinking, emotions, and identity of the lyrical hero. The syntactic choices made by the author are not random but are deeply rooted in cognitive processes and serve to convey complex psychological states, internal conflicts, and socio-cultural models. Specifically, it was found that syntactic devices such as enjambment (carrying a part of a sentence over to the next line), parataxis (co-ordinating sentences without clear subordination), fragmented sentences, and the use of idioms are significant indicators of the lyrical hero’s inner world. Enjambment can create a sense of tension or a flowing stream of thought; parataxis can convey disjointed perception or emotional intensity; and fragmented sentences can reflect interrupted thinking, doubts, or internal struggle. The use of idioms, in turn, can indicate belonging to a specific socio-cultural group or reflect established ways of thinking and perceiving the world. The practical value of the research lies in the development of a flexible yet rigorous methodology that can be applied to the analysis of poetic texts while considering their integrity, and which allows for a better understanding of the relationship between language, thought, and emotion

Keywords

cognitive poetics; poetic syntax; componential analysis; cognitive semantics; construction grammar

Suggested citation
Pokhyliuk, О. (2025). Methodology for analysing cognitive-syntactic phenomena in poetic texts. International Journal of Philology, 16(2), 96-105. https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog/2.2025.96
References
  1. Ahmad, N. (2024). Book review: Ten lectures on corpora and cognitive linguistics. ISRG Journal of Education, Humanities and Literature (ISRGJEHL), 1(6), 22-24. doi: 10.5281/ zenodo.14043832.
  2. Allsopp, N. (2020). Introduction. In Poetry and sovereignty in the English Revolution (pp. 1-25). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198861065.003.0001.
  3. Bimbetov, A. (2024). Model of comparative analysis of the structure and semantics of causal constructions in multi-structural languages. Pubmedia Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(1). doi: 10.47134/pssh.v2i1.281.
  4. Bozorov, A.S. (2024). Comparative analysis of metaphorical patterns. Multidisciplinary Journal of Science and Technology, 4(5), 230-234. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11199312.
  5. Bradford, R. (2005). A linguistic history of English poetry (1st ed.). London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203978702.
  6. Chafe, W. (1999). Floyd Glenn Lounsbury, 1914-1998. A brief obituary. Historiographia Linguistica, 26(3), 333-341. doi: 10.1075/hl.26.3.09cha.
  7. Cho, E.J. (2017). A cognitive approach to text analysis. The New Studies of English Language & Literature, 68, 307-338. doi: 10.21087/nsell.2017.11.68.307.
  8. Duffy, C.A. (2001). The world’s wife: Poems. London: Faber & Faber.
  9. Geeraerts, D. (2006). Componential analysis. In Encyclopedia of language & linguistics (pp. 709712). Oxford: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01029-4.
  10. Grachova, I.E., & Mosiichuk, A.V. (2018). Structural vs. cognitive poetics: Approaches to the study of poetic syntax. Science and Education a New Dimension, 167(50), 23-26. doi: 10.31174/ send-ph2018-167vi50-05.
  11. Hoffmann, T. (2022). Constructionist approaches to creativity. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 10(1), 259-284. doi: 10.1515/gcla-2022-0012.
  12. Janigová, S. (2024). English syntax in a nutshell. Košice: Pavol Jozef Šafárik University (UPJŠ).
  13. Kakhramonov, J.B.U., & Abdurakhmon, N. (2022). Cognitive-semantic approach to literary text. Journal of Academic Research and Trends in Educational Sciences, 1(6), 162-165. doi: 10.5281/ zenodo.6608922.
  14. Mukhammadiyarov, A.J. (2025). Cognitive-discursive analysis of the concept “Soul/Ruwx” in English and Karakalpak poetry. International Journal of Literature and Languages, 5(4), 51-55.doi: 10.37547/ijll/volume05issue04-14.
  15. Mykhalchuk, N., Ivashkevych, E., Nohachevska, I., Nabochuk, A., & Voitenko, O. (2021). Psycholinguistic mechanisms of understanding contemporary poetry by future philologists. Psycholinguistics, 30(1), 139-179. doi: 10.31470/2309-1797-2021-30-1-139-179.
  16. Myronova, N., Pilipenko, V., Mikhno, I., Palamar, M., & Korolyova, T. (2023). Linguo-cognitive analysis of a literary text. Conhecimento & Diversidade, 15(40), 304-321. doi: 10.18316/rcd.v15i40.11253.
  17. Nida, E.A. (2015). A componential analysis of meaning: An introduction to semantic structures. Berlin, Boston: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG. doi: 10.1515/9783110828696.
  18. Qin, Y. (2023). Exploring cognitive linguistics. Communications in Humanities Research, 22(1), 252-256. doi: 10.54254/2753-7064/22/20231765.
  19. Shodieva, S.I. (2021). Basic concepts of cognitive linguistics. Current Research Journal of Pedagogics, 2(12), 156-161. doi: 10.37547/pedagogics-crjp-02-12-31.
  20. Stockwell, P. (2019). Cognitive poetics: An introduction (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780367854546.
  21. Tzeng, O.C.S., Hoosain, R., & Osgood, C.E. (1987). Cross-cultural componential analysis on affect attribution of emotion terms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 16, 443-465. doi: 10.1007/BF01073272.