Structural and semantic types of predicates in the Latin language

Vasyl Shynkaruk
Abstract

The syntactic theory is undergoing dynamic development within linguistic scholarship, with growing scholarly interest in the syntactic structure of the Latin language. This study aimed to analyse the structural and semantic types of predicates within the semanticsyntactic structure of the sentence. The research employed a comprehensive set of methods, ranging from morphological to contextual analysis, combining both qualitative and quantitative approaches. Information from various sources on the predicate as a distinct type of main sentence constituent – characterised by a range of specific features – has been systematised, and the parameters of its functioning have been described. The study addresses the issue of syntactic relationships between sentence constituents – namely, the predicate as the main sentence constituent and the subordinate elements that together form the sentence structure, convey its core meaning, and determine its specificity. The positional placement of the predicate within the sentence structure is analysed, along with its stylistic function, differential features, and forms of expression. It is substantiated that the predicate constitutes the semantic and grammatical core of the sentence and is structurally non-uniform. The study examines the structural and semantic types of predicates in the Latin language, clarifies and systematises existing data on their classifications, and defines the place of each type within the overall typology of predicates. It identifies the means by which compound verbal predicates are extended through the use of modal components and substantiates that the modal meaning conveyed in a sentence depends both on the morphological composition of the compound verbal predicate and on the choice of linking verbs. It is noted that when a verbal base forms part of a compound verbal predicate, the means of expression conveys the corresponding modal meaning of the predicate. The forms of realisation of both verbal and compound nominal predicates are outlined, their usage within sentences is explored, and their functions are supported with examples. The findings contribute to a broader understanding of the syntactic structure of the Latin language. The results concerning structural and semantic types of predicates may be applied in future theoretical research on the semantic-syntactic structure of the sentence

Keywords

syntax; sentence structure; predicative relationship; predicate; simple verbal predicate; compound verbal predicate; compound nominal predicate

Suggested citation
Shynkaruk, V. (2025). Structural and semantic types of predicates in the Latin language. International Journal of Philology, 16(4), 9-25. https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog/4.2025.09
References
  1. Aerts, S. (2021). Multidimensionality in Livys tense system: Towards a functional systematicity of the Latin narrative tenses. Philological Letters, 144(1-2), 43-82.
  2. Boyko, N., & Myronova, V. (2012). Ukrainian-Ancient Greek-Latin dictionary. Kyiv: Publishing and Printing Center “Kyiv University”.
  3. Burkard, T., & Schauer, M. (2020). Textbook of Latin syntax and semantics founded by Hermann Menge. Retrieved from https://surl.li/zqmgjg.
  4. Cherniukh, B. (2022). Folk Latin. Lviv: Ivan Franko National University of Lviv.
  5. Chernyukh, B. (2017). Functional semantics of aspectuality in Latin. The manuscript for fulfilment of qualification requirements. (PhD Dissertation, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Lviv, Ukraine).
  6. Chuban, T.V., & Kardash, L.V. (2020). Forms of expression of predicates in modern Ukrainian language (On the material of Yuriy Horunzhy’s story “Monk and Prince”). Transcarpathian Philological Studies, 13(1), 121-127. doi: 10.32782/tps2663-4880/2020.13-1.25.
  7. Comrie Bernard. (1981). Language universals and linguistic typology. Syntax and morphology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  8. Demo, S. (2012). Time for a revision? The syntax of the simple sentence in Latin grammarSystasis, 20.
  9. Khrystianinova, R. (2016). The typology of predicates in modern Ukrainian languageTypology and Functions of Language Units, 1(5), 182-201.
  10. Kuznietsova, A. (2019). Сontrastive analysis of the compound nominal predicate in Еnglish and Ukrainian language. Young Scientist, 7(71), 272-277. doi: 10.32839/2304-5809/2019-7-71-55.
  11. Melnyk, I. (2019). Structural, grammatical and semantic specificities of predicate in prose works by Zbigniew Wlodzimierz Fronczek. Philological Volyn: Text and Context, 27, 118-130.
  12. Mishenina, T.M. (2002). Compound verb predicate of the mother+infinitive model in the Ukrainian languageComplex Issues of the University Course of the Ukrainian Language: A Collection of Scientific Papers, 66-72.
  13. Molotskyi, V. (2024). Complex compound nominal predicate in modern Ukrainian. Scientific Bulletin of the International Humanitarian University. Series: Philology, 66, 112-118. doi: 10.32782/2409-1154.2024.66.24.
  14. Рetrova, H. (2010). Latin-Ukrainian word-formation dictionary. Ternopil: “Bohdan” Publishing House.
  15. Pinkster, H. (2021). Oxford Latin syntax: The complex sentence and discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  16. Riemsdijk, H. (2021). Elements of syntax. Repulsion and attraction. In S. Bendjaballah, A. Tifrit & L. Voeltzel (Ed.), Perspectives on element theory (pp. 251-274). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110691948-009.
  17. Romaniuk, I. (2023). Semantic and syntactic features of polyprefix verbs in late Latin. In Voices and echoes of antiquity. Materials of the all-Ukrainian scientific conference for the 85th anniversary of professor Andriy Sodomora (pp. 167-176). Lviv: LNU Named after Ivan Franko.
  18. Shevchenko, L. (2023). The role of Latin in the intellectual life of Europeans in the twentieth- twenty-first centuries. Studia Polsko-Ukraińskie, 106-118. doi: 10.31338/2451-2958spu.10.8.
  19. Sihler, A.L. (1995). A new comparative grammar of Greek and Latin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  20. Spieralska-Kasprzyk, B. (2021). Relative absoluteness: Te case of participial clauses in Latin. Philologia Classica, 16(1), 90-99. doi: 10.21638/SPBU20.2021.108.
  21. Terentius Varro, M. (1910). The surviving works of Marcus Terentius Varro on the Latin language. Lipsiae: B.G.Teubner.
  22. Trofymuk, M., & Trofymuk, O. (2001). Latin-Ukrainian dictionary. Lviv: LBA Publishing House.
  23. Vaseiko, Yu., & Masytska, T. (2021). Рeculiarities of compound nominal predicate functioning in legal documents substyle of business language (a case study of the Сonstitution of the republic of Рoland). Linguistic Studies, 14, 15-25. doi: 10.29038/2413-0923-2021-14-15-25.
  24. Vasylevska, O. (2013). Structural changes in the Late Latin sentence. (PhD Dissertation Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Lviv, Ukraine).
  25. Zdorovets, N. (2023) Syntactic structure of language: Analysis of different language systems (ukrainian, english, crimean tatar). Scientific Works of the Interregional Academy of Personnel Management Philology, 4(9), 10-18. doi: 10.32689/maup.philol.2023.4.2.
  26. Zvonska, L.L., et al. (2017). Encyclopedic dictionary of classical languages. Kyiv: Kyiv University Publishing and Printing Centre.
  27.